Hi, Quoting Helmut Grohne (2024-08-20 07:28:52) > What do you think about the proposed criteria and suggested set of source > packages? Is it reasonable to remove these packages from unstable? In a > sense, it is extending the idea of the testing auto remover to unstable. > Similarly, a package can be temporarily saved by mailing the respective bug. if I remember correctly, a package can also become a key package by having a high-enough popcon value. If that is correct, maybe there should also be the inverse. Looking at your list, about 85% of those packages have a popcon lower than 100. Taking the popcon value into account would also kinda make your hand-curated list of exceptions obsolete as your current list has popcons well above 100, for example. If the popcon is taken into consideration, that would also give a little bit of insurance that only very few users will be affected. Thanks! cheers, josch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature